Reactions to Danielle's Reviews

Anoree · 09-29-2009, 10:30 PM

Quote:

What? WHAT?!? Only 77 of 100?? I think the guy rating Danielle's site must have a serious problem.

His best rated single girl site has "Site design is plain" as a con, yet has received 9/10 points for design and navigation - Uh?

He is complaining that Danielle's site has "no browsing features." What's that supposed to mean? With the (imho great) design used for Danielle's site, no fancy search engine or flippy slideshow is needed. (I guess that's what he was searching for - and missing.)

Yes, Danielle's site didn't have as much content as some of the other sites. (The rating was posted about 5 months after the Premium Area launch.) In hours viewing time I think Danielle's site may have closed the gap in the mean time.
Without the early videos and photos "inherited" from FTV Girls and Lia19.com he would have complained even more.
The non-exclusive content can't be more than these. Or he is reffering to the affiliate sites, which ought to bring people to Danielle's site. (I think there are quite a lot of them out there.)

Anyway, my feeling is, he's like test driving a sports car - and complaining about the missing loading platform and hard suspension setting. Not very usefull.

Now I know one rating site I'm not going to rely on.

captnjack · 09-29-2009, 11:25 PM

This review is so far off the mark it is ridiculous. Like Anoree pointed out he contradicts himself several times.

grande351 · 09-30-2009, 02:22 AM

It's also very odd that he gives Alison's site a higher score despite the fact that it hasn't updated since 2008, which he even commented about in his review! Dainelle's paysite hasn't even been open a year yet. These reviewers need to take that into account. Besides, Danielle has much more content on her site than most others do after only 10 months! True, some content was shared with Lia19 and FTV in the beginning, but the reviewer mustn't have noticed that after the first dozen or so updates, all content on DanielleFTV has been exclusive.

The one that really gets me is his complaint about slow downloads. I cannot remember an occaision where I've experienced this. Danielle's updates don't download any slower than anyone else's. I can only guess that he must have been having issues with his ISP on the day he reviewed Danielle's site.

I have posted a comment on the Fox review site and urge everyone else to do it too.

FTVGirls_Rob · 09-30-2009, 07:03 AM

thebestporn is the only site I truly care about, and that is where the traffic does count.

Cowman · 09-30-2009, 08:17 PM

There needs to be an adult review, review site. Where we could post how off the mark some of their reviews are.

mancocapac · 09-30-2009, 10:14 PM

I'll give her an 8 out of 10, but that's only because Danielle hasn't made the time to join me for dinner yet.

danielle_ftv · 10-14-2009, 10:11 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Anoree

His best rated single girl site has "Site design is plain" as a con, yet has received 9/10 points for design and navigation - Uh?

AHAHAHA...that's awesome that you caught that (I didn't notice that but that's probably because I was highly irritated at the time.)

09-29-2009, 11:25 PM	#2
captnjack Danielle's Imaginary Boyfriend Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: 3rd rock from the sun Posts: 818	This review is so far off the mark it is ridiculous. Like Anoree pointed out he contradicts himself several times. __________________ But in your dreams whatever they may be Dream a little dream of me

09-30-2009, 07:03 AM	#4
FTVGirls_Rob Administrator Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: Phoenix Posts: 1,209	thebestporn is the only site I truly care about, and that is where the traffic does count. __________________ http://www.ftvgirls.com

09-30-2009, 08:17 PM	#5
Cowman Dreaming of Danielle Join Date: Jan 2009 Location: B.C. Canada Posts: 73	There needs to be an adult review, review site. Where we could post how off the mark some of their reviews are. __________________ A Canadian is someone who knows how to make love in a canoe. Pierre Burton, historian

09-30-2009, 02:22 AM	#3
grande351 Danielle's Imaginary Boyfriend Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Baltimore, Maryland Posts: 876	It's also very odd that he gives Alison's site a higher score despite the fact that it hasn't updated since 2008, which he even commented about in his review! Dainelle's paysite hasn't even been open a year yet. These reviewers need to take that into account. Besides, Danielle has much more content on her site than most others do after only 10 months! True, some content was shared with Lia19 and FTV in the beginning, but the reviewer mustn't have noticed that after the first dozen or so updates, all content on DanielleFTV has been exclusive. The one that really gets me is his complaint about slow downloads. I cannot remember an occaision where I've experienced this. Danielle's updates don't download any slower than anyone else's. I can only guess that he must have been having issues with his ISP on the day he reviewed Danielle's site. I have posted a comment on the Fox review site and urge everyone else to do it too.

09-30-2009, 10:14 PM	#6
mancocapac Danielle's Biggest Fan Join Date: Sep 2009 Posts: 224	I'll give her an 8 out of 10, but that's only because Danielle hasn't made the time to join me for dinner yet.