Quote:
Originally Posted by TheDoctor
|
Well, the gist of it was that some people got upset that equipment "payed with tax money" was used in "obscene depictions." The news presenter told that "most photos are so explicit that we can't show them." They showed pictures with the truck and a model with big black bars from hairline to knees, suggesting that they were full body nudes or even more explicit.
In an interview a fire department responsible told that the truck was decommissioned and sold to a private person with the fire department logos still on, when they should have been removed.
I compared the censored photos with the actual photo set and found that most of the censored photos showed none to little nudity.
In my eyes the whole topic is based on misinformation and massive exaggeration.
The right question should have been "Why were the logos still on the truck?" and not "Why is somebody shooting erotic photos with one of our fire trucks?"