Originally Posted by Max (Post 25670)

Although I despise this car, I will give my imput: Going 300 MPH would require a special type of tire. I don't know if we have developed a rubber compound for that to withstand the heat. I suppose that it would require a very thick tire, one that could absorb that much heat. A lot of rubber would be necessary. I read that the tires cost $20,000 for a set. Another way to break 300 would be to drop the weight. This thing weighs 2 tons. All it is designed for is to go in a straight line. And on top of that to top it off, it doesn't even come with manual transmission. WHAT WERE THEY THINKING? They just ruined it, it is supposed to be a super car.

Originally Posted by tigger (Post 25673)

They have tires that can handle it. As to what are they thinking, can you make a car from the ground up??????????? Is your bike auto or manual. How fast can you peddle it?

Originally Posted by Max (Post 25679)

there is more to a car than 0-60 or top speed.

Originally Posted by Max (Post 25670)

And on top of that to top it off, it doesn't even come with manual transmission. WHAT WERE THEY THINKING? They just ruined it, it is supposed to be a super car.

Originally Posted by mart (Post 25690)

As long as the car can get me to A to B and back again, that'll do me.

Originally Posted by Raymond (Post 25694)

My car goes 0-60 in 2.4mins. Assuming the engine or transmission doesn't blow-up. haha

Originally Posted by Raymond (Post 25692)

This car has a twin-clutch gearbox that can change gears more efficiently, smoothy and faster that any driver in the world.

I don't know the specifics but Rob explained it to me once when we were in his. Basically it has like 4 clutches or something like that.

Originally Posted by mart (Post 25690)

Exactly Max!, who actually needs a car that can go 270mph. As long as the car can get me to A to B and back again, that'll do me.

Originally Posted by Max (Post 25726)

There's much more to a car than that for me

1: Manual Transmission
This is a subject I talk about ad nauseam, but I really feel that it is that important. There is no advantage to an automatic transmission, unless you are a New York taxi cab driver. No matter what you are looking for whether it be fuel economy, power, or torque, a manual transmission will just get the job done better. Finally it is just easier to drive if you ask me.

Originally Posted by Max (Post 25725)

I don't care if it is more efficient, that just makes it harder to drive. So what if it shifts faster than I can. It's harder to drive.

Originally Posted by Max (Post 25725)

I don't care if it is more efficient, that just makes it harder to drive. So what if it shifts faster than I can. It's harder to drive.

Originally Posted by DWM222 (Post 25812)

Mart...I have to ask Max one more question..off the subject of the thread of course..
Max..I you were going to buy a car & you could only choose from these two..which would it be

1970 Ford Pinto 3-door hatchback with manual transmission
1970 Ford Mustang Mach 1 with automatic transmission

:)

Originally Posted by mart (Post 26090)

Never driven an automatic myself and problably never will. Be weird though, keep reaching to change gear, forgetting it's automatic.:D

Originally Posted by Anoree (Post 26091)

More of a challenge is not to pedal the clutch ... which would be a wider break pedal on automatics. :eek:

The two occasions I drove an automatic, I used a trick my driving teacher told us: I clamped in my left leg between seat and right leg. Uncomfortable, and not good for long travels, but usefull to keep from automatically trying to step on the clutch.

Originally Posted by mart (Post 25695)

Never understood the fascination of this 0-60, my car wouldn't be far behind you Raymond.:D

Originally Posted by Anoree (Post 25728)

And therefore all F1, NASCAR and other class racing cars have purely manual transmissions, right?
Sorry Max, your view about automatics is simply outdated. Modern automatic transmissions can actually help reducing fuel consumption (depending on the driver's habits), and help getting the power efficiently onto the streets. Go to a car dealer of your choice and ask for a test drive with a modern automatic. You might get the surprise of your life.
What IS a point, though, is the feeling of control. With a manual transmission you are in the power of the gear shift. The car doesn't do anything about it for itself. That is mostly psychological, I think, as there are so many assistance systems in modern cars already, that you don't simply drive on your own anymore - which is a good thing, because they reduce the number and fatalities of crashes.

Max, you simply don't like automatics and prefer to drive manual transmissions. That's ok and your decision. Just don't try to preach others into it with invalid arguments, please.

When I was deciding on what I wanted to have in my (now crashed) new car 6 years ago, I did a test drive with an automatic. I was impressed with the speed of changing and how easily it moved the car.
I decided against it because I had to carefully watch the speedometer with that and at that time the fuel economic still wasn't as good as it is now,. Also I like the feeling to be in control of what my car does, too. There were a couple of moments where I regretted that choice, though.
In my current car, bought 2 1/2 years ago, it was just a matter of costs. If I had a few more bugs available at that time, I would have had an automatic transmission built into it.



That is a point with growing importance. I doubt Rob is using his Veyron for every-day-drives but uses his more economic Mercedes for that.