View Full Version : Member Feedback
NOtattoosplease
02-12-2010, 05:47 PM
Do the staff that run FTV ever read the member feed back that comes into their site as in the all recent updates the girls have got Pro-marks (tattoos) yuck.:(:(:(
Anoree
02-12-2010, 06:48 PM
Do the staff that run FTV ever read the member feed back that comes into their site as in the all recent updates the girls have got Pro-marks (tattoos) yuck.:(:(:(
Rob, the owner and head of FTVGirls has stated repeatedly how hard it is to find models who DON'T have tattoos. There are virtually none.
If you search the forum for "Tattoo" you'll find dozens of examples.
FTVGirls_Rob
02-12-2010, 10:16 PM
Well once again if I could do CGI-FTV -- where I could create Avatar-style masturbation shoots, I would create girls without tattoos on their bodies. But this is the here and now, and reality, and I hate tattoos more than you do, but I cannot do anything about it.
ChorniyVolk
02-12-2010, 10:37 PM
Don't really see what the big deal with tattoos are. If it's something like Brooke Banner, then yeah, it is a bit annoying but it's not like I care much for the skin of their arm; but everyone seems to go crazy over even the slightest ink.
Guess it's just something I'll never understand, personal preference and whatnot.
tigger
02-12-2010, 11:07 PM
Well once again if I could do CGI-FTV -- where I could create Avatar-style masturbation shoots, I would create girls without tattoos on their bodies. But this is the here and now, and reality, and I hate tattoos more than you do, but I cannot do anything about it.
You do a great job Rob, I don't like tats eather but what are you going to do!
Raymond
02-12-2010, 11:22 PM
Tattoos?
Pls advise immediately. tattoos really? pls advise.
Woody
02-13-2010, 04:53 AM
Me too! I just don't understand why some of you guys have a problem with tattoos!! But there you go!! We are all different!!
DJango
02-13-2010, 03:39 PM
Me too! I just don't understand why some of you guys have a problem with tattoos!! But there you go!! We are all different!!
Exactly..nothing wrong with a bit of ink. (unless your janine lindemueller[sp?]). Some girls do too much, some do just enough. But to each his own. It doesn't necessarily ruin a shoot.
NOW, the thing that's bad on a girl are implants! Unless your boobs are smaller than mine (I'm a dude without them thank god) OR one is twice as big as the other OR just they just f'd up lookin, stay away from the plastique ladies WTF?!?!??! (uhm, Rob..what gives? more & more of your beauties (yeah, theyre still beauties) are sportin the falsees)
Jeffrey99
02-14-2010, 07:46 AM
NOW, the thing that's bad on a girl are implants! Unless your boobs are smaller than mine (I'm a dude without them thank god) OR one is twice as big as the other OR just they just f'd up lookin, stay away from the plastique ladies WTF?!?!??! (uhm, Rob..what gives? more & more of your beauties (yeah, theyre still beauties) are sportin the falsees)
I agree 100%. I'd take someone covered head to toe in tats over someone with the fake boobs. Especially considering most of them end up looking horrible. Atleast Meggan (Meggan Malone) ended up looking halfway decent with hers. Still think she loooked better before but as with most people that end up going mainstream porn, they end up getting fake.
Woody
02-16-2010, 04:18 AM
I've got a question for FTV? Is is panty stuffing season at the moment?
TypicalUser
04-01-2010, 07:50 PM
Hi,
This is feedback on my FTV experience. It's primarily for Rob to mull over. I'm hoping this criticism is taken in a positive way and leads to improvements in the site. Not that it's bad in any really significant way as it is...
First off, a little background. I'm probably a very typical FTV customer. Happily married with children, age 44, middle-income, technical computer background. Downloading adult stuff to add to the secret collection the wife/kids will never know about. Can't keep an ongoing membership because hiding the charges from the wife is a little tricky. Typical & a little pathetic, eh?
So... I intended to subscribe to the site for a month, skim thru the models, and download the ones that appeal to me most. Problem is, files do not have a unique naming scheme, so as soon as I started to download the second scene of even the same model, the file names started colliding. i.e. 01hd.wmv would get overridden. And I don't have the time/inclination to start manually renaming and organizing files - it's just not worth it.
Thinking about for a few minutes, I decided to unleash a download manager on the site. This would keep the site directory structure intact (unlike directly downloading the files), pull the site down at night, then I could browse the content locally and delete the stuff I don't want. I chose Free Download Manager, set it up, fired it off, and went to bed. The next day I realized just how big the site is - it's HUGE! This isn't a bad thing. But FDM started going crazy, hogging the CPU and not using much bandwidth. Apparently the tool isn't meant to spider such a big site. So I searched around and decided to give HTTrack a try. The tool is tricky & less intuitive to use, but got somewhat better if still mixed results.
So this leads me to my first suggestion. The FTV web site structure is rather strange, with files strewn in odd places. It seems pretty disorganized... Especially the split between "www.ftvmembers.com" and latest1.ftvmembers.com - that caused me to have to re-spider the site several times in an attempt to get the downloading tools to pull down the whole site correctly. I'm a professional software developer who has done a lot of web server work and I'd never let something this disorganized out the door. (Sorry, Rob- not trying to insult you here)
Link modified by Moderator. Do not link to FTV members pages, not all message board members are members of FTV.
There are tools that could easily reorganize the outward facing site while not causing chaos on the back end. Or at least give files unique names. You might want to look into this, Rob. Also, you might want to decide on a download manager policy, and if you support it recommend a tool & structure the site to facilitate batch downloads. As it is, I wasted a fair amount of (my & your) bandwidth finding the proper download settings. I sure hope you have an unlimited bandwidth plan!
That's my primary gripe. Ok, moving on...
I have nothing but the highest praise for the site in general. Rob, you have excellent taste in women. The fresh, pretty girls who haven't been ruined by the industry (yet?) is exactly what I like and I'm sure you know this focus is what makes your site such a big success. But one suggestion would be that the models better shave their private parts before a shoot. I personally don't bush, but just as bad or worse is stubble, stray hairs, razor-burn, ingrown hairs, etc. Other sites (ALS for example) do a much better at getting a clean, smooth shaved look from their girls. I don't know how they do it, but that would be an improvement. Also having the girls douche etc would be good. I hate to think who's white goop dripping out might be. I like clean, clean, clean.
Photography, especially the video... Well, don't shoot the messenger but I think there is room for improvement here, too. To my untrained eye it looks like you shoot at least the videos using natural light. This may be pleasant for the models, but the raw footage quality suffers, especially indoors. In many cases, video footage is somewhat dark & murky, (especially where it counts!) and often has a color-cast from colored walls, etc. I think some high-quality umbrella lights in some key positions would make a world of difference. I like the soft effect you get, but that can be had with plenty of light in the shot at the same time, right? And the HD cameras sure seem to like a lot of light... I'm not sure what the differences are, but sites like givemepink.com seem to get sharper, more saturated videos at a similar data rate.
Ok, that's about it. Sorry for the long post.
PS - Some random thoughts - I won't be here to enjoy improvements & updates, at least not for another year or so. Which is too bad. The FTV site makes me think that I may have missed my true calling - starting a site similar to FTV back in the days before I got tied down with obligations. One of my early girlfriends actually wanted to publish her super hardcore pictures in a men's magazine, but I backed out when she said she was doing it to get back at her parents (for obvious reasons.)
PPS - Rob, if you want to contact me, you have my email address (my user name is '5NQTpwRE'). I'd be happy to elaborate on anything you'd like to discuss. I'd even be willing to help you figure out how to restructure your site if you're interested.
captnjack
04-01-2010, 09:52 PM
Wise advise I am sure but then Rob must be doing something right. Many a sites have come and gone since the start of Ftv and even more never made it to the starting gate.
grande351
04-01-2010, 11:08 PM
Please remember too, that FTV is pretty much a one man operation. Rob shoots practically all of the content, both video and stills, edits 100% of it and probably does umpteen dozen other things that we who don't run websites have no idea about. If he's not the hardest working man in the adult industry, I don't know who is.
optionmo91
04-02-2010, 01:21 AM
why with all the good quality i have seen. being a on and off member of the site ftvgirls. all the peeps out in the site hating on the ftv staff. they work hard bringing girls that look sexy center stage for all to look at. i just dont know what is wrong with people these days. i love the site, the girls, and the new x clips. guys keep it up. love the site. and if may and i know it might not happen. my favorites are rose and violet. if possile bring those two back. but if cant, thats ok. again love the site keep it up
Flinch
04-02-2010, 02:41 AM
The haters are the most vocal a lot of the time is all. Plus the internet gives them the balls to hate that they don't have in the real world. ;)
DJango
04-02-2010, 04:55 AM
why with all the good quality i have seen. being a on and off member of the site ftvgirls. all the peeps out in the site hating on the ftv staff.
Where are you gettimg that idea from?
one guy is bothered by tattoos.
one guy is bothered by the way the files are named and the shooting style in general, BUT...
where do you see people "hating" on the FTV staff?
rlf01
04-03-2010, 03:50 AM
I agree with TypicalUser in that the redundant use of file names in an update is a nuisance. But, since I have a brain and at least one finger that works, I can overcome it.
ChorniyVolk
04-03-2010, 11:02 AM
Don't know what the tattoo hate is about either. If anything, it slightly made me feel bad that Meilani had to cover her fairly large sleeve tattoo with makeup, hopefully she didn't feel uncomfortable about it in anyway.
Also, optionmo91 reminded me: what happen with Violet, Rob? Did you guys contact each other or...?
And I'd also like to know what's up with http://www.ftvgirls.com/contact.html
Are all the "people" mentioned there just a joke?
Texasdrake
04-03-2010, 11:32 AM
I'm not a big fan of Tats on females,but if they few,not overly large and in the right places then I can live with it.Danielle for example hers I never had a problem with due to thier location and size and how few she had.
The one I hate the most are large pieces such as full back pieces, sleeves and the ones that takes up the whole leg.
As for Rob's site its the best one I ever came across even with the tats.Its rare that I ever come across a model I didn't like due to her tats.
I do believe it's time for a huge makeover for this site. This site was built when the internet was younger. Now we look at this stuff on phones and iPad's. I have always hated that I have to rename all the file names. And the splash shot in the beginning of every segment is bothersome. Only opaque titles should be used at the bottom of the screen and for the previews. All in the spirit of Kaizen.
ChorniyVolk
04-04-2010, 07:44 PM
I think the site is just fine the way it is, and I love the shot at the beginning of every video, for many reasons.
I don't see any point in changing anything with the site, Rob has enough work already.
OK, yes this is a good site. I really don't expect Rob to rebuild this site. But instead of him buying another multi-million dollar house or car instead pay somebody huge amount of money to make this the best site on earth. Something always needs improvement.
WhyYou
04-06-2010, 08:24 PM
Ok, I think this thread has gotten a bit off topic. Yes, it's interesting to learn how everybody stores their adult content, but this thread is supposed to be for Member Feedback. So let us all get back to that topic.
Anoree
04-07-2010, 08:20 PM
OK, the off topic posts got way out of hand. They got moved to a new thread Update storage strategies (http://danielleftv.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1334). Have fun there. ;)
neukgraag
04-07-2010, 10:17 PM
Hi,
First off, a little background. I'm probably a very typical FTV customer. Happily married with children, age 44, middle-income, technical computer background. Downloading adult stuff to add to the secret collection the wife/kids will never know about. Can't keep an ongoing membership because hiding the charges from the wife is a little tricky. Typical & a little pathetic, eh?
Get an Only1 prepaid Visa card at the grocery store and buy Reloadit cards using cash to put money on it. Totally anonymous. No mail, no statements, nothing and your wife does not need to know.
First off, a little background. I'm probably a very typical FTV customer. Happily married with children, age 44, middle-income, technical computer background. Downloading adult stuff to add to the secret collection the wife/kids will never know about. Can't keep an ongoing membership because hiding the charges from the wife is a little tricky. Typical & a little pathetic, eh?
NO! Not even a little. You ARE a typical user just like most of us.
vBulletin® v3.7.3, Copyright ©2000-2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.